Monday, June 20, 2016

Beside Ourselves with Longing, Love and Heart-breaking Consequences

Title: We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves
Author: Karen Joy Fowler

Short-listed for the Man Booker Prize and winner of the 2014 PEN/Faulkner Award, this big-hearted novel by the bestselling author of The Jane Austen Book Club tells the story of a middle class family, typical in every way but one. From the publisher: "Meet the Cooke family: Mother and Dad, brother Lowell, sister Fern, and Rosemary, who begins her story in the middle. She has her reasons. 'I was raised with a chimpanzee,' she explains. 'I tell you Fern was a chimp and already you aren't thinking of her as my sister. But until Fern's expulsion...she was my twin, my funhouse mirror, my whirlwind other half and I loved her as a sister.'  As a child, Rosemary never stopped talking. Then, something happened, and Rosemary wrapped herself in silence."

Insights and Opinions


The Indomitable Five -- Margy, Shirley, Blanche, Chris, and Vicky -- couldn’t hold themselves back from discussing this novel. They jumped right in at 7:30, which is our designated time for social catching up, and talked non-stop (as narrator Rosemary Cooke might have done had she been a part of our group) for the next hour and a half.  

+ Blanche posed the first question, asking Chris to say more about why she was “completely beside herself” about this novel.  Chris talked about how reading the novel was fascinating, yet she felt somewhat anxious as she read. We talked about how Rose herself was off kilter because she spent the first five years of her life as the sister of a chimp. Her instability is reflected in the telling of her story, thus partially explaining the edgy tone of the narration. 

+ The novel starts in the middle of the story as Rose does not want to let anyone (including us, the readers) in on the truth about her past. As the truth is revealed, we see how Rose herself comes to terms (sort of) with her upbringing. “I’m sobbing and sobbing,” she says, as she lets herself recall her part in losing her sister, Fern. It was “a thing I’ve never let myself imagine before.” By the end of the novel, as Rose finds solid ground, we the readers also feel calmer and more grounded. Ultimately Rose finds Fern and acknowledges her sister: “My sister, Fern. In the whole wide world, my only red poker chip.” 

Other Discussion Topics (just a few of many)

+ Role of the two suitcases: Rose loses the one that contains her mother’s story of her real past, just as she has lost or buried her memory of her sister, Fern. She ends up with a second suitcase containing Madame Defarge, a ventriloquist’s dummy, or someone who speaks for another, the way she must now learn to speak for Fern and for her true self, as sister to Fern. By the end of the novel, Rose and her mother have used the stories to create something useful and redemptive: a children’s book.

+ Rose’s monkey behavior: She acts out with Harlow, a chimp-like friend. They both (and also Rose’s brother, Lowell) end up behind bars or in cages, just like Fern. Rose exhibits certain bonobo (pygmy chimp) sexual behaviors in one scene with Harlow, Reg and two other young men. “I wonder if I had sex with all of them, would they calm down?” she thinks (p. 168). “I’d have bitten him by now,” she says in the bar scene.
  
+ Our kinship with the animals in our world: We talked about how this book makes us even more aware of the world we share with animals: our kinship, our shared environment. “It was always her (Fern’s) failure for not being able to talk to us, never ours for not being able to understand her,” says Rose.

+ During our discussion, Shirley dropped in quotes that she had marked while reading the novel. We talked about each one as she read them. 

“My father was himself a college professor and a pedant to the bone. Every exchange contained a lesson, like the pit in a cherry.  To this day, the Socratic method makes me want to bite someone.” (p. 6).

“Antagonism in my family comes wrapped in layers of code, sideways feints, full deniability.” (p. 19).

“His mother, my aunt Vivi, fit into our family about as well as my father—we’re a hard club to join, it seems.” (p. 22).

“I know from Grandma Fredericka, and not our parents, that I once went missing for long enough that the police were called, and it turned out I’d tailed Santa Claus out of a department store and into a tobacco shop where he was buying cigars, and he gave me the ring off one, so the police being called was just an added bonus on what must have already been a pretty good day.” (p. 57).

“The only way to make any sense of the United States Congress, our father told me once, is to view it as a two-hundred-year-long primate study.” (p. 92).

“’The secret to a good life,’ he told me once, ‘is to bring your A game to everything you do. Even if all you’re doing is taking out the garbage, you do that with excellence.’” (pp. 271 – 272).

“But no one is easier to delude than a parent; they see only what they wish to see.” (p. 274).

“I still haven’t found that place where I can be my true self. But maybe you never get to be your true self, either.” (p. 297).

“I’m unclear on the definition of person the courts have been using. Something that sieves out dolphins but lets corporations slide on through.” (pp. 304 – 305).




Monday, April 18, 2016

One Story, Two Perspectives -- Is Either of Them True?

Title: Fates and Furies
Author: Lauren Groff
Host: Liz

A finalist for the 2015 National Book Award, Fates and Furies has been nothing if not controversial among its critics. From the publisher: "At age twenty-two, Lotto and Mathilde are tall, glamorous, madly in love, and destined for greatness. A decade later, their marriage is still the envy of their friends, but with an electric thrill we understand that things are even more complicated and remarkable than they have seemed. With stunning revelations and multiple threads, and in prose that is vibrantly alive and original, Groff delivers a deeply satisfying novel about love, art, creativity, and power that is unlike anything that has come before it."

Insights and Opinions

+ Shirley found the structure of the book and the author's narrative method fascinating -- the story told from two points of view, brackets for comments directed at the reader [a technique found irritating by some], and the reader left to sort it all out.

+ Liz noted that the volume consists of two very different books. Fates is one sort of book. Furies is a second type altogether. Fates is Lotto's story, told from the perspective of a self-absorbed and very unreliable narrator. Furies is Mathilde's book, bound together by twists and surprises. As we read her story, we are stunned to see her true self, in contrast to Lotto's telling.

+ Linda (and the rest of us) considers Groff an extremely gifted writer. But she also found herself wondering -- is this really the way things were sexually during college in the 90s?

+ These two characters are as fascinating as they are unlikable. Both are nasty people. Neither has friends. Even Chollie, Lotto's "lifelong friend" is little more than a parasite. Yet both are entirely wrapped up in each other. At the end (spoiler alert), when we find out what Mathilde is really like, we wonder if her terrible mother wasn't actually right all along.

+ Steve found the book to be over-written, but wasn't bothered by it as he appreciated the many gems in store for the reader throughout. "I cared about the characters within ten pages," he said. "It was magic for me." Margy was equally engrossed, especially as Furies opens. At this point, it's clear the reader needs to hang on and get ready for the coming whirlwind.

+ Steve felt Groff does an extraordinary job in bringing Lotto's plays to life, describing the artistic process, and playing with the concept of beauty. Is Mathilde beautiful or not? Is Lotto handsome or not?

+ Sex is an important theme in this book. There was some discussion around whether it was used as a device to increase sales, but we all disagreed with that, deeming it an effective exploration of two people who are primarily sexual. For them, sex is the primary way in which they relate to each other.

Oddments and Telling Details

+ Conversation was thrown open to the question about what to do when the mini-library in one's front yard fills with donated bodice rippers and Rush Limbaugh books. The verdict: toss 'em!

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Oh, Margaret, We Hardly Knew Ye

Title: The Heart Goes Last
Author: Margaret Atwood
Host: Shirley

Our February group was small, as it is during these snowbird months when half our group is south of the Mason Dixon Line cheating on us with their other book clubs. Initial chatter via email in the run-up to our book-club night had already tipped us off to how this conversation would go. And sure enough, Margaret Atwood fangirls and boys that we may be, we were already buzzing before we got our coats off. This is not Atwood's best work.

WARNING: This post contains:
+ Plot spoilers
+ Guilt, due to not wanting to be harsh about the work of any author, especially one whose work we typically admire.

Insights and Opinions

First, a little set-up. The book opens in some not-too-distant future time, when the bottom has fallen disastrously out of the economy, and society has sunk into chaos. Stan and Charmaine, a previously financially secure married couple, are now living in their car, sleeping with one eye open and scrounging for food.

When Charmaine sees an advertisement for Consilience, a planned community that promises security, jobs, food, safety, and comfort, she is immediately sold.  Stan is less so, but decides to succumb to Charmaine's desires. The only downside is that, as a resident of Consilience, you live one month in a lovely home, and then the next month in the Consilience prison. Married couples share their home with an "alternate" couple, but the two never meet. Until, in Stan and Charmaine's case, they do.

+ Only three of our group of five had actually finished the book. Joanne stopped reading midway through, and Chris was still struggling to finish, ran out of time, and admitted to finding it hard to make herself finish. "I love books that make me uncomfortable, and she does that in other books I've read and liked. I like otherworldly stories, when an author changes the rules on how society works." But Chris found this one coming up short, feeling that Atwood has done a better job in some of her other works of creating characters with whom you can find empathy.

+ We all agreed the characters were flat and uninteresting. Both Stan and Charmaine, the married couple at the center of the story, are shallow and cartoonish. We don't really care what happens to either of them.

+ Steve found the plot clever and liked the satire. As he started, he felt the book had real possibilities that were never realized. Both Steve and Chris found Conner, Stan's criminal brother, to be the most interesting character. But his potential never pays off. We feel like he's going to be important, but then he isn't.

+ Liz wondered if some of the flatness we felt was due to the fact that most of the action takes place off screen. There are many, many plot twists and turns, but we find out about them by reading people thinking. Stan is thinking about something that happened, or something that's going to happen. Then, Charmaine is thinking about something that happened, or something that's going to happen, or several possible things that might happen. All of this thinking, pondering, worrying, and considering leaches energy from the book, which could perhaps have been better shown through writing the scenes.

+ While "Heart" presents an alternative future for us that could have been fascinating, the book seems to center most on sexual obsession. Charmaine is obsessed with Max. Stan is obsessed with Jasmine and her purple lips. Ed is obsessed with Charmaine. Jocelyn is obsessed with who knows who. And, none of these obsessions are very interesting. Even the concept of mandatory love through surgery, introduced at the end, seems not to be about love at all, but about sexual obsession.
Shirley's stuffed dates looked somewhat like this,
only prettier.

+ After finishing the book, Shirley had gone to Amazon.com to review it, and gave it a score of "1," which means forget it. Much to her horror, Amazon highlighted the phrase "you don't learn anything about these people except for their sexual proclivities" and moved the review to the top. Now, Shirley fears people will buy the book just to read about sexual proclivities. Just be warned that the sex isn't very sexy.

Oddments and Telling Details


+ Shirley stuffed a bowl medjool dates for us, which was pretty amazing, and earned her extra credit.

+ Steve was heading out the next day to race in the American Birkebeiner.

+ Book recommendations from this well-read crew include: Short Loves Last Forever, The Folded Clock, The Honeydew Stories, We Know How This Ends, Purity, Brooklyn, and Those Who Leave and Those Who Stay



Sunday, February 14, 2016

Next Up: The Heart Goes Last

Title: The Heart Goes Last
Author: Margaret Atwood
Host: Shirley

This book is already controversial with our group, and we haven't even discussed it yet, except through email.

Here's what the publisher has to say, to wet your various whistles:

"Margaret Atwood puts the human heart to the ultimate test in an utterly brilliant new novel that is as visionary as The Handmaid's Tale and as richly imagined as The Blind Assassin.


Stan and Charmaine are a married couple trying to stay afloat in the midst of an economic and social collapse. Job loss has forced them to live in their car, leaving them vulnerable to roving gangs. They desperately need to turn their situation around, and fast. The Positron Project in the town of Consilience seems to be the answer to their prayers. NO one is unemployed and everyone gets a comfortable, clean house to live in…for six months out of the year.

On alternating months, residents must leave their homes and function as inmates in the Positron prison system. Once their month of service in the prison is completed, they can return to their civilian homes. At first, this doesn't seem like too much of a sacrifice…but…with each passing day, Positron looks less like a prayer answered and more like a chilling prophecy fulfilled."