Wednesday, March 21, 2012

One Has Good Reason to Love How It All Began, Doesn't One?

Brie, fruit, gluten-free crackers and bunnies

Title: How It All Began
Author: Penelope Lively
Host: Joanne

With apologies to Vicky, whose good guidance has kept us from ruining many a good book club discussion by firing right out of the chute with "well, I loved this book" or "I hated this book," we were unable to contain ourselves. First comment of the night on Penelope Lively's How It All Began -- "well, I for one loved this book," followed by the second comment -- "thank you for having us read this." We are unanimous in our affection for this fine work.

Insights and Opinions

+ Our group of Midwesterners fell in love with the essential Britishness of this book. Charlotte, one of the main characters who has been injured by a mugger, opines "Just what one didn't want. Being a burden and all that. What one had hoped to avoid." And, as Charlotte's daughter Rose recalls her first interview before being hired by Lord P -- "String of letters after his name; people sometimes glancing at him, thinking: why do I know that face? Shirty enough if anyone looked like taking liberties." Lots of stiff uppers throughout.

+ One of the distinguishing aspects of this novel is the richness of its characters, especially the two older characters -- Charlotte and Lord Peters. These are real people, not just old people being old, as Joanne stated.

+ The academics among us found a lot to recognize in Mark, the unctuous, slimy academic with an agenda who sucks up to Lord Peter to satisfy his own ends.

+ Beautiful details add richness to the narrative without intruding. While riding in a cab, for instance, Charlotte establishes that her cab driver is from Eritrea "and that minicab driving was for him a secondary occupation that funded his main concern, which was the compilation of the first dictionary that would give three-way reference between English and the two main languages spoken in Eritrea. This conversation had been prompted by Charlotte's having noticed that he had a copy of Samuel Johnson's Rasselas lying on the passenger seat." A small vignette that tells us much about both Charlotte's character and the richness of London life.

+ The theme of "story" undergirds the book's structure -- from immigrant Anton's learning to read by consuming children's stories, to the value of reading in general, to the individual stories of each of the characters in the book following an arc of tension and coming to a satisfying conclusion.

+ Margy felt the characters in the book fell into two camps -- those who have lived their lives, and those who have merely ridden along on opportunity.

+ At nearly 80, Lively understands what it means to be on the second half of life. She delivers many wonderful passages about the difficulties of old age, all followed by beautiful passages that show how much joy she takes in life.

+ Definitely read the two-page section on reading as "necessary fix" on pages 34 and 35.

+ The style of this book is somewhat cinematic -- we slip quickly from one character's point of view to another's without apology.

Oddments and Telling Details

+ What's your opinion about the relative merits of looking up unknown words while reading? One of us believes this interrupts the flow of deep reading, while another believes reading with a dictionary nearby is a good thing and helps a reader fully grasp the author's intention. (The question really is "is look-up on an e-reader a good thing or a bad thing?") Discuss.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Death Comes to Pemberley -- Or Does It?

Roses with nosh.

Title: Death Comes to Pemberley
Author: P.D. James
Host: Margy

In fact, Pemberley may never die. Ever since Jane Austen created the fictional estate that is the focus of conflict in her beloved novel Pride and Prejudice, it's been revisited in movies, movie remakes, PBS specials, zombie attacks, and now a murder mystery by renowned author P.D. James. It's interesting how a light mystery that falls into the category of "summer reading" can throw our group of book lovers into a paroxysm of disagreement, but there you have it. We like to complicate things.

Insights and Opinions

+ Whether or not you love this book may depend on whether or not you love Jane Austen and how many times you've read Pride and Prejudice. Those among us who have read Austen recently were less transported than those who hadn't picked up an Austen book in awhile.
+ This is a quick read with strong forward momentum. Many of our group loved the prologue, characterizing it as a "perfect precis" of the original story. If you missed the original, not to worry. James sets the stage for you.
+ P.D. James is clearly a thorough researcher, writing with authority to inhabit a world.
+ Linda felt the book was heavy on plot and thin on characterization. The wit that draws readers of the original work into Elizabeth's character is largely missing. On the other hand, it's perhaps not fair to judge a book against expectations the reader brings to the reading.
+ A few naysayers were bothered by the amount of exposition in the book, but they were roundly shouted down (in our nice non-shouting way).
+ One observer wondered why a writer of P.D. James' status would take on the challenge of extending such a beloved story. This is always a risky proposition.
+ James introduces a joyful cynicism in some of her description -- the pastor's sermon length, the invalids who manage to make it to church for the scandal, and Charlotte's report to her mother on "her cows, poultry, and husband."
+ All in all, five of us characterized the book as "entertaining and fun" -- with two harumphing.

Margy's fabulous library (part of it, actually.
It's spread out all over the house.)

Oddments and Telling Details

+ One of us has actually had dinner with P.D. James, twice. A very gracious woman. The rest of us were suitably impressed.
+ The sommelier did a wonderful job, and we should consider inviting him to every session.
+ Steve will be gone in March, and just back from CHINA at our April meeting.